The main energy consumers in a water-cooled air conditioning system are the chiller, recirculating pumps, tower fans, and air handler fans.

Chiller efficiency is important because it reflects the amount of energy required to produce a ton of refrigeration. It is typically measured in KW/Ton
and is a function of the chiller design, operating conditions, and heat transfer efficiency. Effective water treatment helps optimize chiller efficiency
and minimize energy costs by keeping the evaporator and condenser heat exchange surfaces clean and corrosion free.

Compressor, Condenser & Head Pressure
A chiller transfers the heat “picked up” from the building by the chilled water system to the cooling tower, where it is discharged to the atmosphere.
The compressor provides the driving force for the refrigeration cycle and is the primary consumer of electricity in a chiller. The compressor
functions to increase the refrigerant temperature and pressure. Anything that increases the workload on the compressor will increase energy
consumption.

In the condenser, heat is transferred from the hot refrigerant gas to the cooling water, which causes the refrigerant gas to cool and liquefy. The
temperature of the condensed refrigerant has a corresponding vapor pressure called the condensing pressure or condenser head pressure.

The compressor is designed to work at a certain condensing pressure for a given load. The term “high head pressure” refers to condenser
pressure that is higher than it should be for a specific load condition.

Condenser Fouling & Energy Costs
Deposition (fouling) on the condenser tubes reduces transfer, increases the condenser head pressure, and results in higher energy costs.

Reduced heat transfer in the condenser causes the compressor to work harder, increasing the refrigerant condensing temperature and pressure in
order to transfer the same amount of heat to the cooling water. Each additional 1 oF in refrigerant temperature requires the compressor to
consume 1.5% more energy. If the deposit thickness is great enough, condenser head pressure will exceed the chiller limits and the chiller will
shutdown.

Some deposits are more insulating than others and thus have a greater impact on the head pressure and energy requirements. For example,
calcium carbonate scale deposits transfer heat up to 4 times better than biofilm deposits (slime). As a result, slime increases head pressure and
energy requirements and will shut down a chiller much faster than “normal” scale. Condenser deposits can be a mixture of slime, scale, corrosion by-
products, and suspended solids scrubbed from the air.

The following table shows the potential economic impact of scale deposits on a 500 ton chiller running at full load, 24 hours per day. Actual
increased energy use depends on compressor type, actual operating head pressure, and percent operating load.

For the same thickness, the increased cost associated with a biofilm deposit can be significantly greater than with scale, depending on the actual
scale composition. It becomes clear that good microbiological control is vital for efficient chiller operation.

Deposit Thickness, inches         Fouling Factor         % Efficiency Loss         Increased Annual Electrical Cost Scale Deposit
0                                                   0.0000                         0                                                                   $ 0
0.01                                              0.0008                         9                                                                   $ 19,790
0.02                                              0.0017                         18                                                                 $ 39,580
0.03                                              0.0025                         27                                                                 $ 59,365
0.04                                              0.0033                         36                                                                 $ 79,155
0.05                                              0.0042                         45                                                                 $ 98,945

Condenser Deposit Thickness vs. Increased Electricity Cost
Based on electricity cost of $0.07 per KWH, a chiller efficiency of 0.65 KW/Ton, a power factor of 0.91. Scale assumed to have thermal conductivity
of 1.0 BTU/(hr)(SqFt)(F o)

Other Factors Influencing Head Pressure
Besides waterside fouling, there are 3 other conditions which can cause high head pressure:
1.        Non-condensable gases (i.e. air) in the refrigerant
2.        Low condenser water flow rate
3.        Condenser inlet water temperature too high

In diagnosing a high head pressure condition, all of these factors should be investigated as possible causes.

Evaporator Fouling
Fouling in the evaporator tubes will also increase energy costs. Fouled evaporator tubes can cause a drop in refrigerant evaporating pressure that
reduces its density. As a result, the compressor must pump the gas to a higher pressure to remove an equivalent amount of heat from the chilled
water. Again, the compressor must work harder, which increase energy requirements.




























Condenser Head Pressure

% Load         Refrigerant 11         Refrigerant 12         Refrigerant 22         Refrigerant 113         % Increased Electricity Used
       Psig                                 psig                         psig                                 psia         
30                         8.0                                 113                         198                                 10.0                                 16
          11.0                                 125                         232                                 11.5                                 32
          14.5                                 140                         270                                 13.0                                 51
50                       10.0                                 123                         223                                 11.0                                 17
          14.0                                 137                         264                                 12.5                                 34
80                       10.5                                 126                         218                                 11.5                                   6
          13.5                                 138                         260                                 13.0                                 20
100                     13.0                                 135                         236                                 12.5                                   8
          15.0                                 142                         259                                 13.5                                 16

Condenser Head Pressure vs. Load For Different Refrigerants
5975 Dixie Hwy
Saginaw, Michigan   48601
Phone        1.989.746.0700
Fax             1.989.746.0777
http://energy.ca.gov/pier/portfolio/Content/Completed97to06/Completedprior05plusEISG05/An%20Integrated%20Anti%20Fouling.htm